Ah, election day. The day I walk into the SUB for my morning coffee and notice over a dozen cameramen and reporters just milling about in the concourse. Were there more bonfires last night? Another murder in the park? Doesn't seem likely.
Who's that grey-haired man with snazzy glasses walking in with an entourage? Why it's Gordon Campbell, coming to the SUB for his voting photo-op!
I wish I had had my own camera on hand, but I suppose you can watch some footage on any newscast this evening. It was interesting to see the news machine at work.
He brought the full entourage, including the seldom-seen wife, kids and grandkids, with one big burly RCMP officer dressed in black, constantly standing on the periphery.
As he entered a voting booth, he had his back to the reporters. Being hopelessly naive, I expected the cameras at that point to turn away, or stop filming at least temporarily, to respect the fact that voting is supposed to be private. Instead, they stepped it up a notch. The CityTV cameraman was particularly shameless, holding his camera aloft above his head in hopes of getting a better shot. For Christ's sake, do you want him to just pass around his marked ballot? It's not like you don't know who he's voting for.
Then came the posing with his ballot half in the box. If the photo-op nature of this event was not yet obvious enough to observers, he asked everyone if they had gotten the shot they wanted before actually putting it in the box. Then the scrum moved outside for a brief Q&A.
At this point I was thinking: where's the AMS? Let me first say that I absolutely don't have any expectations that it is the AMS execs' duty to constantly harass Gordon Campbell or other politicians. That should not be one of the primary duties in their job description.
However, the external office did put out a press release in April bitching about how ministers made themselves unavailable, (followed of course by the obligatory NayloRant™). The AMS has told the world that they are quite eager to meet with politicians, and are unhappy that they were not able to. So you might think that having the premier walk into their own god-damned building on election day followed by a gaggle of reporters and cameramen might represent a good chance to ask him some questions! No such luck today, though Blake and Crystal did leave whatever they were doing to catch the very end of the scrum.
I couldn't actually hear most of the questions and answers since in the interest of informing the public about this absolutely vital story (Premier ♥ voting and democracy!) the media formed an impenetrable wall around him, keeping the actual public away. He pimped out his grandkids, and gave some pretty stock answers to some pretty milquetoast questions. Then it was off to the parking lot by the bookstore to do... whatever else he is doing today.
Edit: Well, there it is. Gordo and his ballot, currently the lead picture on globeandmail.com. You can even make out the out-of-focus AMS logo in the background.
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Gordo In Da House
Posted by
Neal Yonson
at
10:46 AM
Categories: Government, News, VP External
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Candidate Questionnaire: Stefanie Ratjen
Stefanie Ratjen is a VP external candidate. Here are her answers.
Why do you want to be the VP External of the AMS?
I am aware of the issues affecting students both on and off the campus. While some people treat this as a popularity contest or a resume-padding opportunity, I am running because of the issues themselves. I know what needs to change, and I want to this opportunity to do it.
What personal skills and experiences could you bring to the portfolio?
I'm familiar working from "within" and "without" a governing body at UBC. I have been active with the AMS Resource Groups for years, with the AMS Student Environment Centre (which is hosting its annual conference this weekend!!!!), as well as the AMS Social Justice Centre, AMS Clubs such as Students for a Democratic Society, and I host student-initiated programs including Cinema Politica and the Radio Free ubc segment on News 101 on CiTR 101.9. I have attended AMS and UBC Board of Governor meetings to see how decisions are made first-hand. I am also involved with the ongoing Trek Park initiative, which has played a prominent role in ensuring that student voices are listened to in the U-BLVD project.
In my activities at UBC I have had the opportunity to converse with a lot of students. Many concerns have come up, and a lot of these issues, such as increasing tuition, decreasing quality of education, and lack of a student voice in decision-making, need to be addressed through real action. I believe that the VPX is not just about asking the right questions, it's about making sure that student voices are heard where and when it matters. I'm not just ready to work for students to ensure their interests are represented, I've already been doing this for quite some time.
If there was one thing you could change about the AMS what would it be?
The AMS needs to engage and inform more students about decisions and events that are taking place. Lack of AMS accessibility and awareness of current student-issues can be reversed by making real gains for students, and having the courage to tackle difficult but important high-profile issues. When the AMS stands up for students, students will notice the AMS and student apathy will disappear into thin air. The AMS and student issues matter. Students need to not only know that, but believe it. Previous executives have failed to make the AMS relevant. I won't.
What would be your approach to the CASA/CFS relationship? What are your priorities on federal higher education lobbying?
With the current state of affairs, I don't really see it as a "CASA or CFS" question. In regard to higher education lobbying, it's the provincial level that has the most influence over higher education. Via the BC University Act, this is the level where decision making structures and funding programs for post-secondary education are determined. This is where students need a stronger voice.
The thing is that CASA, while maintaining a strong federal relationship for UBC, does not lobby, as a union, on a provincial level. This is where the Canadian Federation of Students, or CFS, comes in. One of the major differences between the two student unions is that CFS does lobby, as a union, at the provincial level. Furthermore, the UBC Vancouver AMS is the only student union in British Columbia to choose CASA over the CFS. This is not to say the CFS is the ultimate alternative. One of the reasons that the UBC Vancouver AMS is not a member of CFS is because its executive was not transparent enough, and because it costs more to join, which would entail an increase in student fees. In addition, over the last year, some of the other BC student unions have left CFS, and are choosing to operate independently.
We need to have a strong voice at the provincial level. Neither national student union guarantees this. We need to have schools and students working together to be effective. Building a strong relationships and positive relationships with other BC schools is necessary. The outgoing VP External has already been working on this idea, and has established relationships with some of the other post-secondary education institutions in BC, particularly those that are now independent. I will work with other schools in British Columbia to establish a well-organized coalition to advocate for students, pushing for the necessary governance and funding changes through detailed recommendations (we'll do the work for the government).
What's your stance about access to higher education? What's your vision of a fair tuition and financial aid system for UBC, B.C., and Canada?
Education is a right, not a privilege. The burden of debt faced by half of UBC students averages nearly $25,000. The financial cost of getting a degree has a serious impact not only on students but on who gets to be a "student." Furthermore, unequal access to education is deepening the rifts in our society caused by sexism, racism, and financial background or class. This is completely unacceptable. All people should have access to the same educational opportunities. We need to look beyond "assistance" based financing towards affordable education. One of my top priorities is to restructure funding and an increase in government transfers for education. The provincial government is the body that makes the most important decisions regarding how much funding goes into what kind of financial assistance program for post secondary students. I will work with other post-secondary institutions in BC to address such issues at the provincial level, where it counts the most. Working with AMS policy analyst(s), I'll do a comparative analysis of grant and debt forgiveness models from across Canada (and the world) in drawing up concrete proposals.
How do you feel about the AMS passing principled policy motions on external political issues?
Maybe it's influenced by UBC's geographic location, but I feel that it's very easy to get wrapped up into a UBC bubble. However, what goes on outside UBC can affect what goes on inside UBC. The relationship between Vancouver housing costs and on-campus development, or transit fare hikes and the U-Pass, are just two examples. Global citizenship is a cornerstone of the UBC marketing strategy. We should be able to acknowledge our roles as citizens not only in the University, but in local and global social networks.
How will you build relationships with politicians for lobbying? Be specific
I believe that the AMS VPX should be representing the interests of students to the municipal, provincial, and national governments, rather than the other way round. Legislative governments need to listen to their voters, especially if that message is loud and clear. As I mentioned before, what I want to do is build strong relationships with other BC schools to establish a well-organized coalition to advocate for students, at the decision-making levels that have the most impact. We need to build and maintain solidarity with local and national universities to ensure that this happens.
Posted by
maayan kreitzman
at
1:20 PM
Categories: AMS Elections 2008, VP External
Candidate Questionnaire: Freeman Poritz
Freeman Poritz is a VP External candidate. Here are his answers.
Why do you want to be the VP external of the AMS?
Because I want to dedicate a year of my life to working for my University. I have gained so much from my time here that I really want to give something back. I am interested in experiencing university from the student government side of things. I think I will make a great VP external. Most importantly, I am willing to work for it.
What personal skills and experiences could you bring to the portfolio?
Excellent social skills, good communication, optimistic personality, strong work ethic.
Journalistic prowess: I know how to ask the right questions and get the right answers. I am persuasive and can meet deadlines.
I hold a fellowship position with CJPAC (Canadian Jewish Political Affairs Committee), a multi-partisan organization which promotes political engagement. Through them I have met many high level politicians including Conservative MP’s Stockwell Day and John Baird, Liberal MP Scott Brison, NDP MP Pat Martin.
I know how to work within a governing body. I served on the executive board of my fraternity as secretary.
If there was one thing you could change about the AMS what would it be?
I would try and limit the bureaucratic red tape in all cases as much as possible. It is always difficult to get things done in governing bodies, and from what I see the AMS is no different.
What would be your approach to the CASA/CFS relationship? What are your priorities on federal higher education lobbying?
UBC is a founding member of CASA. CASA gives UBC a professional federal lobbying group for about $44,000/year. I believe this is a small price to pay for membership when compared with CFS. CFS would cost approximately $125,000/year to join and also requires a referendum vote to gain membership. I say why leave a good thing that costs less. The UBC-CASA relationship is a strong one, and I believe it should remain strong. However, I would like CASA to work together with CFS on issues of strong mutual commitment.
Lobbying Priorities:
1) Due to the strong Canadian dollar, I would like to lobby the federal government to keep tuition low and affordable.
2) I also want to lobby with regards to loan policy – the ‘middle class crunch’ is affecting too many of us. Students do not have enough money to pay for school, yet do not qualify for financial aid. This must be remedied.
What's your stance about access to higher education?
Anyone who meets the academic requirements of a post-secondary institution should be allowed to attend, regardless of financial background.
What's your vision of a fair tuition and financial aid system for UBC., B.C., and Canada?
If a qualified student is unable to pay his own way, he must have an avenue of recourse.
Fair tuition = Low tuition.
How do you feel about the AMS passing principled policy motions on external political issues?
In my opinion this should not be part of the VP External portfolio or the AMS council mandate. We are elected to serve the interests of the student body with regards to student affairs. Individuals in the AMS may express their views on an individual basis, but not on behalf of the AMS.
How will you build relationships with politicians for lobbying? Be specific.
As I mentioned earlier, I have already been in close contact with some politicians. I plan to improve on those relationships and through CASA receive introductions to the relevant politicians and committees for student needs. I plan to make the necessary effort to contact all politicians relevant to students’ needs (federal, provincial, and municipal).
Posted by
maayan kreitzman
at
12:05 PM
Categories: AMS Elections 2008, VP External